Re: [pseudo] [PATCH 0/3] closefrom/close_range: protect every pseudo fd, then drop one

Hi Baban,

On Tue, 2026-07-28 at 05:08 +0000, Babanpreet Singh wrote:
> A gentle ping on this series and the close_range v2 it stacks on
> (which Richard okayed on-list on 16 Jul).
>=20
> I noticed pseudo master has moved since (now ca47829, with the
> memory-handling and openat2 changes). I've checked that both series
> still apply cleanly on top of current master, so no rebase is needed.
> Happy to rebase and resend anyway if that's more convenient.

Sorry, we haven't forgotten about this, we even did discuss it briefly
yesterday! Mark has struggled for time and I've been juggling a few
other issues.

There were a few fixes ahead of yours in the queue, I have those merged
as you mentioned. We then have yours and the logging fixes along with
some tests Mark worked on which are next.

I've pushed your changes onto master-next where there were some minor
conflicts with other changes. I'll run some wider tests on the
resulting branch.

Cheers,

Richard