Re: [yocto-patches] [wic][PATCH v2 0/4] oe/path: three fixes plus unit coverage

Paul Barker <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:04:05 +0100
Newsgroups org.yoctoproject.lists.yocto-patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--=-tJlN8uO4mj0XukorzSaG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2026-07-30 at 07:55 -0400, Trevor Woerner via
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On Fri 2026-07-24 @ 04:04:55 PM, Paul Barker via lists.yoctoproject.org w=
rote:
> > On Fri, 2026-07-24 at 07:50 -0400, Trevor Woerner via
> > lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> > > This series continues the standalone unit-test work, this time over
> > > oe/path.py. It follows the same shape the suite settled on: each
> > > source fix is its own standalone commit, and the green test module
> > > lands last, so the suite passes at every commit.
> >=20
> > LGTM, assuming these are direct copies of what was added to OE-core.
>=20
> Almost. The 3 "fix" patches are identical, but the unit test patch is
> different because wic uses pytest and oe-core uses unittest. The test
> coverage and what is tested are the same between them, just expressed
> differently depending on the test framework.

Thanks for clarifying. wic doesn't need to be limited to using unittest,
so this makes sense to me :)

Reviewed-by: Paul Barker <[email protected]>

Best regards,

--=20
Paul Barker


--=-tJlN8uO4mj0XukorzSaG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIcEABYKAC8WIQSzjPXf5Y1BDWhU2iCrY1Tsnbr0bgUCams9tREccGF1bEBwYmFy
a2VyLmRldgAKCRCrY1Tsnbr0bsefAQDYrdKEcXMSAfS5tqhNuS0KUGiph8rQ1rCO
m254GhC8LAEAu+524zVxvYYq5gC2jOrXiQ3xhLc0rCoj32yDU23tkAE=
=iZ21
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-tJlN8uO4mj0XukorzSaG--