Re: [yocto] FIT image verification not working on imx8mm

Hi Francesco

Thanks for having a look at this issue and the corresponding code, much 
appreciated!

On 2/22/26 11:33 PM, Francesco Valla wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 10:39:15AM +0000, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> For a secure boot project on Toradex Verdin with imx8mm, I'm trying to
>> enable FIT image signature verification in U-Boot.
>>
>> Slava's "Generation of FIT images" presentation at the recent OE workshop
>> has been very useful:
>> https://pretalx.com/media/openembedded-workshop-2026-2025/submissions/R8KJQZ/resources/_LJtpFTR.pdf
>>
>> I generated a temporary local RSA 2048 key, and I'm using it to sign a FIT
>> image.
>>
>> I also set the UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR, UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME and UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE
>> variables to add the public key to U-Boot's DTB.
>>
>> The signature indeed appears in the generated u-boot.dtb file, in a
>> "/signature" node:
>>
>>      signature {
>>
>>          key-imx8mmsb {
>>              required = "conf";
>>              algo = "sha256,rsa2048";
>>              rsa,r-squared = <0x56bb2a2b 0xc6b322cc 0x2f828666 0x75c8bc46
>> 0xd13093af 0xc2244c35 0xb6420649 0x478d7ed3 0xeb7a0399 0x3b1d49a9 0xc106169d
>> 0x7328dbb4 0x2140c49b 0x111732a1 0xb3286fed 0x53937163 0x8c28f85c 0xe272b1ee
>> 0x5e009a53 0x13883205 0xcda0fbc7 0xd7ed4e75 0x9ed065c1 0xb6ca1e69 0xf2c9dce2
>> 0xcf8ebf7b 0x59a72b94 0x501d2751 0x437e3355 0xcba6b07a 0x9b13feea 0x1032d715
>> 0xab3cdd83 0x319b6bb0 0xfc31ff93 0xb7fabbb6 0x79d5d0fa 0x9c0f76e0 0x3528c22e
>> 0xbbec6d6c 0x7981362f 0x528848a9 0xb57aa235 0x462ed577 0x4ccc8b9d 0xeb4ce969
>> 0x5fb085b3 0x3fced511 0xfd98edfe 0xf3a4ca51 0x1bb74370 0x3a11c748 0xbbd5be95
>> 0x946f8b3f 0x3d8c98b6 0x3b0e00a8 0xeca87fc6 0x7331981e 0xaaee80df 0x476816f2
>> 0x509aaab1 0xa5f50e1a 0x474d0de8 0xc551ac97>;
>>              rsa,modulus = <0xb3ade247 0x4b8d0aef 0x4581e5e9 0x6084f135
>> 0x778847c7 0xaf23976f 0x81b6eb84 0xa2406db4 0x2b89e624 0x81f913c9 0xd6ebef10
>> 0x3e30adee 0xbca06cbe 0x5693b23b 0xc6b211f1 0xfea7a90d 0x2767ca7c 0xaa8b2ddb
>> 0xcf8a63ea 0x66fe8c59 0x43b34a2f 0x720009d8 0xa2a61281 0x2f7fe049 0xfc3d10e5
>> 0x1b52409 0xdeb52a16 0xa4e5fa78 0x7116d181 0xc0c2f39e 0x24a626b4 0x7e59438b
>> 0x6680b1f4 0xc4b1184c 0x8bb65f34 0x92038fd7 0x3901c347 0xc2095158 0x3159031a
>> 0xaa4bb76c 0xc53f2009 0x9f4941f8 0x736ca84a 0xd83bd011 0x3685d02c 0x6f4cb5e7
>> 0xd07e8566 0x173819f 0x8f41366d 0x8b0f82fd 0x54c01fc0 0xc216cbd5 0x2fc4a666
>> 0x426ff669 0x880428ca 0x7c7615c 0xcdc97895 0x8c936a3c 0xd6d7e82e 0x5bf63d9d
>> 0x9fcd83a2 0xb131015f 0xc530c031 0x8446f707>;
>>              rsa,exponent = <0x00 0x10001>;
>>              rsa,n0-inverse = <0x93653949>;
>>              rsa,num-bits = <0x800>;
>>              key-name-hint = "imx8mmsb";
>>          };
>>      };
>>
>> I also compiled U-Boot with
>> |CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE=y
>> |
>> However, when U-Boot loads the FIT image, it only checks the integrity of
>> the sha256 hash of the FIT image parts:
>>     Verifying Hash Integrity ... sha256+ OK
>>
>> No signature checking happens. I can also load an unsigned FIT image which
>> is accepted too. Indeed, when I open the generated "imx-boot" file (or
>> "flash.bin", linking to the same file) that is used to boot the board, I can
>> see a DTB for my board, but it doesn't contain any "signature" node, unlike
>> in "u-boot.dtb".
>>
>> What could I be missing? My layer, along with a kas file to generate the
>> image, is available on https://gitlab.com/rootcommit/meta-imx8mm-secureboot.
> (From what I can infer from the layer, since there are no explicit
> dependencies declared, you are using meta-toradex-nxp, which in turn is
> depending on meta-freescale. The idea/suggestion that follows starts
> from this assumption, if your setup is different I may be totally
> wrong.)

I believe that's correct, from the kas file in the layer.
>
> What is the value of the UBOOT_PROVIDES_BOOT_CONTAINER variable?
>
> If it is 1 (as it might be, as meta-freescale sets it to 1 for imx8m*
> SoCs if the bootloader is not u-boot-imx [0]), the imx-boot container
> is generated by U-Boot using binman, which however iis / should not be
> able to use the u-boot.dtb binary with the signature. The injection of
> the signature in fact happens on the u-boot.dtb binary only after this
> has been deployed [1], which in this case would be *after* the imx-boot
> blob has been generated.
Indeed UBOOT_PROVIDES_BOOT_CONTAINER="1"
I'll study the corresponding code. Thanks again for your help!
Cheers
Michael.