RE: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status 24 February 2026 (WW09)

"Marko, Peter" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:25:36 +0000
Newsgroups org.yoctoproject.lists.yocto
Message-ID <AS1PR10MB569713CB5E8CD0E4FF61017BFD72A@AS1PR10MB5697.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <openembedded-
> [email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 16:29
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status 24 February 2026 (WW09)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Current Dev Position: YP 6.0 M2
> Next Deadline: YP 6.0 M2 Build Date 2026-02-16
> 
> Next Team Meetings:
> - Bug Triage meeting - Thursday 26th Feb. 7:30am PDT
>   (https://zoom.us/j/454367603?pwd=ZGxoa2ZXL3FkM3Y0bFd5aVpHVVZ6dz09)
> - Weekly Project Engineering Sync  - Tuesday 24th Feb. 8am PDT
>   (https://zoom.us/j/990892712?pwd=cHU1MjhoM2x6ck81bkcrYjRrcmJsUT09)
> - Yocto Project Patch Review - Thursday 26th Feb. 10am GMT and Monday 2nd
> Mar. 9am
>   (https://zoom.us/j/97762397148?pwd=1xk0iC9hp9SjEonaTaONwTb6iWry4Eb.1)
> 
> Project data dashboard: https://dashboard.yoctoproject.org/
> 
> Key Status/Updates:
> - YP 4.0.33 is due for release
> - YP 5.0.16 is in QA
> - YP 5.2.3 is queued for QA
> - YP 6.0 M2 is due to build when we have patches merged
> - We have two open high issues which need further work that will block M3:
>     - x86 kvm broken on Fedora 43 (cpu features issue?) (#16074)
>     - AB-INT: opkg-build segmentation fault (memory corruption in
>       pseudo?) (#16078)
> - We also have issues we need to resolve before release:
>     - Allowing non-destructive git fetcher updates for bitbake-setup
>     - Splitting wic into an external tool
>     - Kernel rust support
>     - Switching to pkg-config
>     - Deprecation of ltp (upstream dropped runltp and mandate kirk)
>     - How to improve DEBUG_BUILD?
>     - DISTRO_FEATURES changes to ‘nodistro’ in OE-Core
>     - SBOM/cve-check changes
> - We updated “nodistro” to use 3 of the include files poky was already
>   using:
>     - Space optimization to reduce build footprint and sstate object
>       size
>     - Disabling most static libraries by default (build size/speed wins)
>     - Enabling security flags by default
> - “nodistro” now also enables uninative by default to allow for better
>   CDN sstate reuse
> - Distros now need to use INIT_MANAGER to select their preferred init
>   system with the default being systemd for “nodistro”. Poky’s defaults
>   remain unchanged and we don’t have plans to change this at this time
>   due to the work involved and impact (e.g test result comparisons).
> - The number of intermittent failures affecting builds, both stable and
>   development, continues to be problematic - we continue to prioritise
>   addressing these since any given build is now statistically likely to
>   hit one or more of them.
> - Patches are merging but there is a backlog and we’ve had to prioritize
>   simpler changes. We continue to struggle for bandwidth for changes
>   needing in depth review/feedback. This could impact features making it
>   into the LTS.
> 
> Want to contribute? We would appreciate help with the following areas:
> - We have several open issues for pseudo and limited maintainer time to
>   work on them. Help from someone familiar with systems programming in C
>   would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=661406&priority=High&priority=
> Medium%2B&product=Pseudo&query_format=advanced&resolution=---
> - There are a large number of intermittent failures on our autobuilder,
>   any help with investigating, reproducing or solving these issues would
>   be welcome! https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/abint/
> - Many recipes in openembedded-core would benefit from a new recipe
>   maintainer. Please look at
>   https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-
> core/tree/meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc
>   and see if you can adopt any of the unassigned recipes.
> - For more ways to contribute, see
>   https://docs.google.com/document/d/18oxKWxLorfF813h82mK6yKTIHeBp_-
> 9owFuCWbzgjOk/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> New to the project?
> - We have a list of issues we think are good places to start
>   contributing:
>   https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=NEWCOMER
> 
> Tracking Metrics:
> - WDD 2941 (last week 2973) (https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html)
> - OE-Core/Poky Patch Metrics
>     - Total patches found: 1108 (last week 1106)
>     - Patches in the Pending State: 151 (14%) [last week 152 (14%)]
>     - https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/patchmetrics/
> 
> YP 6.0 Milestone Dates:
> - YP 6.0 M2 Build Date 2026-02-16
> - YP 6.0 M2 Release Date 2026-02-27
> - YP 6.0 M3 Build Date 2026-03-09
> - YP 6.0 M3 Release Date 2026-03-20
> - YP 6.0 M4 Build Date 2026-03-30
> - YP 6.0 M4 Release Date 2026-04-26
> 
> Upcoming dot releases:
> - YP 5.0.16 Release Date 2026-02-20
> - YP 5.3.2 Release Date 2026-02-27
> - YP 4.0.34 Build Date 2026-02-23
> - YP 4.0.34 Release Date 2026-03-06
> - YP 5.3.3 Build Date 2026-03-09
> - YP 5.3.3 Release Date 2026-03-20
> - YP 5.0.17 Build Date 2026-03-16
> - YP 5.0.17 Release Date 2026-03-23
> - YP 4.0.35 Build Date 2026-04-06
> - YP 4.0.35 Release Date 2026-04-17
> - YP 5.3.4 Build Date 2026-04-13
> - YP 5.3.4 Release Date 2026-04-24
> - YP 5.0.18 Build Date 2026-04-20
> - YP 5.0.18 Release Date 2026-05-01
> - YP 5.0.19 Build Date 2026-05-26
> - YP 5.0.19 Release Date 2026-06-05
> 
> The Yocto Project’s technical governance is through its Technical
> Steering Committee, more information is available at:
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/TSC

This TSC wiki is outdated (e.g. next election May of 2025).
Wiki which is getting updates is https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/TSC

Is there any purpose in having two different pages in TSC and syncing them?
Or should one of them be deleted (ideally redirect to the other one)?

> 
> The Status reports are now stored on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Weekly_Status
> 
> [If anyone has suggestions for other information you’d like to see on
> this weekly status update, let us know!]
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> --
> Paul Barker