Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-6.0_M2.rc3)
Richard Purdie <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:19:48 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.yocto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <55ddd958fb39e440b7a45cd9c18aa175c3e893c6.camel@linuxfoundation.org> |
On Mon, 2026-03-02 at 11:38 +0000, Pokybuild User via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > A build flagged for QA (yocto-6.0_M2.rc3) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at: > > https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-6.0_M2.rc3 > > > Build URL: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/29/builds/3316 > > Build hash information: > > bitbake: bc8be83aef0a6de85cd33a6f132f281d518594f7 > meta-agl: c1761e898d7fca3d8438e9b010eaf234f94fa407 > meta-arm: b00fe8862bc31cd4b6f0299b6a2edb244f19487a > meta-aws: b570577bf3ae3752e27bac15faf8733e45a01360 > meta-clang: cf20f8bd1366d41094c945597b95dd746e87b871 > meta-intel: b6c23896d3eee0f925cbe189ff1e67b3c4953353 > meta-mingw: 11666fce6a3cc98bcff6fe2c6bdd9e48faf03767 > meta-openembedded: 6ba45c1f94e1c2015df940ec9efcd4568346df56 > meta-qcom: 1a7b6b0363fa75232d46ffb9fd706b9539872e10 > meta-virtualization: 506d5af230f0b41809dfe754e84d5611b75c6585 > meta-yocto: f3b63d0d6882af61020bd6f7150fae68a0322f63 > oecore: be8cdcf13a658e9e81ff2f7b71d1c8c37a920ce7 > yocto-docs: d97cfeaa55ed42722998d3313c1857aa377f6881 > > > > This is an automated message from the Yocto Project Autobuilder > Git: git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2 > Email: [email protected] There were two error issues with this build: a) A ruby reproducibility issue in the docs package. There is a patch on the mailing list. A v1 of a patch was merged instead of a v2. b) A failure with the regression report generation due to confusion about tags. As well as some warnings: a) python3 ptest failure on qemuarm64 b) Warning about duplicate includes from meta-agl-core c) warning about fedora-43 not being a supported host (patch now merged to fix) Since two issues have fixes ready or merged, one is easily fixed, and the python3 ptest issue is known, that leaves the regression report issue. That will need more investigation/work but I don't believe any of these should further block M2 from entering QA. Cheers, Richard