Re: [yocto] Limiting Yocto Memory Usage
Randy MacLeod <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:30:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.yocto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--------------XHqk9WPTPsScaV5ujsf8smJT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com id 66TL6KAs2605756
On 2026-07-28 17:36, Ferry Toth wrote:
>> Nice, are you interested in trying to get that or something based on=20
>> that work merged into oe-core/master ?
>> I have been wanting to do for a while but other responsibilities keep=20
>> pushing it to the back burner or out of the kitchen completely !
>>
> Yeah that would be great. The patches were originally suggested by=20
> Richard Purdie. What spooks me a bit (based on earlier experience) is=20
> what additional stuff (self tests?) would be needed to get this accepte=
d.
I hear what you're saying.
I worked on Martin's jobserver patch set for a while and I was trying to
add some tests to prove that it was working well.
I think there's also some questions about the set of features that we=20
would implement.
I've send the set of patchs to you at this email address. Look at them=20
if you like.
I've been too busy to review how they differ from your approach.
All for now, time for another freaking meeting!=C2=A0 ;-)
../Randy
--=20
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
--------------XHqk9WPTPsScaV5ujsf8smJT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2026-07-28 17:36, Ferry Toth wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]">
<blockquote type="cite" style="font-size: large; color: #007cff;" qctoggled="true">Nice, are you interested in trying to get that
or something based on that work merged into oe-core/master ?
<br>
I have been wanting to do for a while but other responsibilities
keep pushing it to the back burner or out of the kitchen
completely !
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Yeah that would be great. The patches were originally suggested by
Richard Purdie. What spooks me a bit (based on earlier experience)
is what additional stuff (self tests?) would be needed to get this
accepted.</blockquote>
<p>I hear what you're saying.<br>
I worked on Martin's jobserver patch set for a while and I was
trying to <br>
add some tests to prove that it was working well. <br>
<br>
I think there's also some questions about the set of features that
we would implement.<br>
<br>
I've send the set of patchs to you at this email address. Look at
them if you like.<br>
I've been too busy to review how they differ from your approach.<br>
<br>
All for now, time for another freaking meeting! ;-)<br>
<br>
../Randy<br>
<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------XHqk9WPTPsScaV5ujsf8smJT--