Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Correct numbering

On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:42:36 +0000
Milan Lakhani <[email protected]> wrote:

> Renumber the steps in submit-checklist.rst as some numbers were skipped.
>=20
> Fixes: 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF")
> Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst | 24 ++++++++++++-----------=
-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst b/Documentation/=
process/submit-checklist.rst
> index 1879f88..230ee42 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst
> @@ -75,44 +75,44 @@ and elsewhere regarding submitting Linux kernel patc=
hes.
>  13) Has been build- and runtime tested with and without ``CONFIG_SMP`` =
and
>      ``CONFIG_PREEMPT.``
>  
> -16) All codepaths have been exercised with all lockdep features enabled=
.
> +14) All codepaths have been exercised with all lockdep features enabled=
.
>  
> -17) All new ``/proc`` entries are documented under ``Documentation/``
> +15) All new ``/proc`` entries are documented under ``Documentation/``
[...]

I've applied this, but, if you're going to stick a "Fixes" tag onto a
patch, it's probably only polite to copy the original author.  I'm not
fully convinced that the tag is warranted in this case.

This document seems out of date in a number of ways; it could really use a
rather more thorough updating than this.

Thanks,

jon


-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#228): https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/message/=
228
Mute This Topic: https://lists.elisa.tech/mt/78985953/5278000
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/unsub [linux-safety@a=
rchiver.kernel.org]
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-