Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] mm: vmscan: provide a change to the development-process group

"Sudip Mukherjee" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:14:28 +0100
Newsgroups tech.elisa.lists.linux-safety
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 17/09/2020 09:44, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> I think this change is needed for safety, whatever that might mean to you.
> 
> I am unqualified to really make a change here, as I have no clue what this
> code does, nor what my change does, but sure, the testing and verification
> reference process can now point out the required next steps in the
> reference process to test this code and code change.
> 
> Good luck :)
> 
> Not intended for distribution to the general kernel mailing lists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
> ---
> I would like to submit such a patch, what do I need to do according to
> the expected testing and verification recommendations for safety-related
> systems?
> 
> Please help me. What do I need to compile, what test do I need to run,
> which verification tool do I need to employ for this change?

The change looks valid, 'reclaim_order' has not been used anywhere after
READ_ONCE(), and its  So, it looks like a harmless change, you will only
need a good commit message detailing why its harmless.

So, from a safety pov, is it a requirement that every submitted patch
will need to be tested based on the safety tests and all the other
defined tests?



-- 
Regards
Sudip