Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] mm: vmscan: provide a change to the development-process group
"Sudip Mukherjee" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:14:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | tech.elisa.lists.linux-safety |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/09/2020 09:44, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > I think this change is needed for safety, whatever that might mean to you. > > I am unqualified to really make a change here, as I have no clue what this > code does, nor what my change does, but sure, the testing and verification > reference process can now point out the required next steps in the > reference process to test this code and code change. > > Good luck :) > > Not intended for distribution to the general kernel mailing lists. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> > --- > I would like to submit such a patch, what do I need to do according to > the expected testing and verification recommendations for safety-related > systems? > > Please help me. What do I need to compile, what test do I need to run, > which verification tool do I need to employ for this change? The change looks valid, 'reclaim_order' has not been used anywhere after READ_ONCE(), and its So, it looks like a harmless change, you will only need a good commit message detailing why its harmless. So, from a safety pov, is it a requirement that every submitted patch will need to be tested based on the safety tests and all the other defined tests? -- Regards Sudip