Re: Future Perl development

[email protected] (Richard Foley)
Newsgroups perl.advocacy,perl.perl5.porters
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:03, Peter Scott wrote:
> [Copied to advocacy list in a probably vain attempt.]
> 
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:25:24 +0100, demerphq wrote:
> > 
> > This seems like something that should be handled by the donations to
> > TPF (or some similar organization) by hiring a professional to do it
> > right.  Isnt this exactly why we have a donation fund? So that we can
> > pay to get the stuff that we arent good at done properly by a
> > professional?
> 
> Wow, what he said.  I was sharpening my keyboard to make the same comment
> when I read this.  I've seen a little of how professional fundraisers work
> and they are *so* different from your average hacker.  Not only do they
> possess a charisma for communicating with moneybags that eludes most of
> us, but their constant exposure to that work will likely lead them to
> ideas that haven't occurred to us.
> 
Hear hear - it's a point that's often overlooked.  We're professional 
programmers for a reason and they're professional fundraisers for a reason.

-- 
Richard Foley
Ciao - shorter than aufwiedersehen

http://www.rfi.net/

ps. Please resend any bounced or unanswered emails.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.