RE: An ML:: namespace?

<snippage>

> And this touches on the heart of the problem, as I've described in
> another email.  It's not that "AI" carries a lot of baggage... So what?
> It's that the category is just TOO broad!

Yeah, I agree, it's too broad. But it's not just that. The Math:: category
is arguably broader... and yet I don't cringe when I hear the word "Math".
Ya know?

<snippage>

> And I'm thinking that acronyms are probably suboptimal, in general.

I'm with you there.



________________________________________
matt youell
http://www.youell.com/matt/
Visit beautiful Einstein County, KY - "Where everyone's relative"