RE: An ML:: namespace?

> You quoted me out of context.  I agree with what you say
> about NLP and computational linguistics.
> My point about KM (Knowledge Management) was that
> most products in this area use very little of this.

I left my opinion unclear, and I'm just realizing it after reading this
morning's batch of posts. I didn't mean to suggest AI:: go away. I meant for
KM:: (or whatever - your pet name here) to be an additional category
parallel to it, for libs that the authors feel don't quite fit into AI for
one reason or another. I get the vibe that this still would not be popular,
though. Just a thought.


> Anyway, thanks for agreeing that keeping "AI" is perhaps
> the most appropriate name for the namespace.

There does seem to be a consensus for this. I suppose if It Ain't Broke...



________________________________________
matt youell
http://www.youell.com/matt/
"It's hard to get people to drink the Kool-Aid."