Re: Categories
[email protected] (Sean Fritz) Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:50:54 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | perl.books.workers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7050218.1012524654844.JavaMail.studentlifecalendar@mail.widener.edu> |
------=_Part_8782_5702796.1012524654843 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Technical -> utilities (grep, awk, sed) Technical -> editors (emacs, vi) DR> and maybe other categories. The only sticky wicket that needs to be DR> decided is if a book can be in a parent and child at the same time, like: DR> Technical -> Programming DR> Technical -> Programming -> Perl u>hmm, a node only has other nodes or books? u>or could it have both? u>i would like to keep nodes either filled u>with books or other u>nodes. sharing a node bothers me somehow. nntp.perl.org seems to be down atm, so you get the lovley formating of my web based email.. *shrug* ok, I can see that format working well, I was designing from a frontpage standpoint rather than an organizational(sp?) my vote is to make it so a book can't be a member of any child nodes. I think it works ok to have a node contain both books and sub-nodes, because otherwise the perl heirarchy will have to be so amazingly complex in order to hold everything that it would be almost worthless. <a href="http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Programming/Languages/Perl/?tc=1">an example of this in practice</a> ~Sean ------=_Part_8782_5702796.1012524654843--