Re: RFCs
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:30:59 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:10:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > Chaim Frenkel writes: > > I move that we create an list (perl6-rfc) that would recieve all RFC's. > > When you have an RFC you think is ready for wider publishing, the > librarian will > (a) assign a number if it doesn't have one > (b) put it on the web site > (c) mail it to the -announce list > > I'm trying to wake up the old librarian now, and will find another > if he can't be located :-) > > I don't think an rfc list is needed. So the librarian must monitor perl6-all and extract the RFCs from the uninteresting bits? I agree that a list isn't needed, but it would be nice to at least have an alias such that mail to [email protected] goes directly to the librarian. Then we could say that RFCs aren't "official" until they've been regurgitated from the librarian with a proper RFC number. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [email protected]