Re: RFCs: two proposals for change

[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) Fri, 4 Aug 2000 01:08:16 -0700 (PDT)

Newsgroups	perl.bootstrap
Message-ID	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0008040104450.7586-100000@impatience.valueclick.com>

On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:

...
> I think the confusion is with what Internet RFCs are, not what perl's RFCs 
> are. Many of them are proposals, or working drafts. The big difference is 
> that internet RFCs have code behind them (usually), while ours precede code 
> writing.

Yes yes! I agree very much.

Some internet RFC's is not even that close to actual code or
standards. Some of them are even jokes.

  http://sunsite.auc.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc527.html
  http://sunsite.auc.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc1606.html
  http://sunsite.auc.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc2795.html 



 - ask 

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>