Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections

Larry Wall wrote:
> John Porter writes:
> : 
> : I think we can safely presume that the pod-to-foo translators will have
> : been locally hacked to account for the RFC-ish nature of the documents.
> : IOW, that L<RFC1> will be correctly translated into
> : <a href="/rfc/1.html">RFC1</a> or some such.
> 
> I'd say it's a flaw in pod that you can't import a policy like that with
> some sort of "=use" declaration.

I'll do the RFC, if no one has yet.

-- 
John Porter