Re: Working Group Proposal

[email protected] (Dan Sugalski)
Newsgroups perl.bootstrap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Derek J. Balling wrote:

> I'll just say that "I disagree". I don't think you should EVER have 
> to recompile your perl binary to get something a program author 
> thought would be available in THEIR perl binary.

I strongly disagree as well. Maybe (*maybe*) particular backends will have
well-defined optional pieces missing (like, say, dynaloading, or the
lexer), but that's as far as I'd like to go.

I have no problem with (and would very much like to design in from the
start) the potential to *change* or overload the way keywords work via
modules, but that's a very different thing. 

					Dan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.