LGPL issues (was Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal))

Simon Cozens wrote:

> Section 2 of the LPGL states that libraries derived from LGPL get LGPL, and
> that you can't just snag code and shove it in an application, but rather it
> has to be released as a separate library -

Basically, "separate library" means "separate source files".  Any source
files that are licensed to us under the LGPL would remain LGPL'ed.  The rest
would be under any license we wish, basically.

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5fQko53XjJNtBs4cRATYeAKDQ3cywV692AofZSfeKOxDIahYEvwCfeya5
hakbUO4JWlAaUG1xftFydAY=
=BRCc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----