Re: Voting/Decision making guidelines

At 10:44 AM 7/25/00 -0400, Chris Nandor wrote:
>At 14:42 +0100 2000.07.25, Hugo wrote:
> >people realising it before it is too late. I think this is one thing
> >that the voting may have been intended to address - "hey folks, this
> >may be the _last_ chance to make your views known" - but I think it
> >is probably not the best way. If the RFC approach is done right, I
> >think it can solve this problem: for that, I think a) there needs to
> >be a way to say 'notify me when the RFC text changes', and b) the text
> >of the RFC needs to be updated (among other occasions) when consensus
> >starts to emerge but before any final decision is taken.
>
>Excellent ideas.  That way people don't have to monitor mailing lists just
>so they can keep an eye out for when something that they know interests
>them is going to come along.

In which case it might be useful to have some means of automatic 
notification when an RFPC (or one of its children) changes. A mutant 
mailing list, or website signup thing or something.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk