Re: source control
[email protected] (Joshua N Pritikin)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:04:18AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > But from what I've heard of Perforce, it sounds like a better tool. It is, but it's not open source. I don't care, but maybe some people do. I say screw them, I think we should use it anyway. :-) > What I'd like in a change management system is for everyone in the world > to be able to update, modify the latest code, and commit their changes > into a playpen. If we're lucky, then maybe be able to use a pool of > diverse Sourceforge machines to run make test all over the place. Then > ask the change mgmt system to generate the patch in a standard format, > with an id. Then we'll always know what version anything is patched > against, the patches can be shared with anyone, and we can group them > into big change sets and talk about them like they're alive and > slobbering all over the couch in the living room. I'm with you. Sounds great. Maybe perforce would like to kick in some resources...? -- May the best description of competition prevail. (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)