Re: Complex Problems vs. Simple Tools

[email protected] ("Mike Lacey")
Newsgroups perl.bootstrap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Peter Scott" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Tom Christiansen" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: Complex Problems vs. Simple Tools


> On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 07:08:23PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
> > At 07:53 PM 7/24/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> > > >By way of further inflammatory suggestions, I would like the (less)
> > > >strictness levels to be install-time options, so that sites can make
> > > >policies for their developers that prohibit some or all strictness
being
> > > >turned off in their perl.
.
.
. [lot's of good stuff deleted here]
.
. [this - from Abigail's reply]
> Coding standards are good. But everyone has their own ideas on what good
> coding practise is.
>
> I do not think it's Perls task to force coding standards, or even any form
> of strictness by default.

Abi - with respect.

Giving site admins the ability to enforce the use of 'use strict' and -w
might well be a step forward in terms of how Perl is seen by corporate I.T.
management. If options like this could be specified at compile time it would
give those sites *who* *want* *it* the ability to enforce them. The rest of
us (hmmm, not me probably) would continue as we are....

Mike
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.