Re: What about many many mailing lists?

[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen)
Newsgroups perl.bootstrap
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007251539580.21602-100000@impatience.valueclick.com>
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:

> > > I'm still expecting people to object to the idea of many many lists.
> > > What happened to the people who were saynig yesterday that there
> > > should only be a few lists?
> >
> >No way man, the more lists the better!  }8-)
> 
> And in that trend...
> 
> I've set up a *temporary* list for mulling about the guts of perl 6, and 
> it'll last just past the point that the official list gets set up. (It may 
> well last all of three days... :) Send mail to [email protected] with a 
> body of "subscribe perl6guts". It's a place to informally bandy about 
> internals-level stuff (not language design or organization, mind) that 
> isn't bootstrap.

uhmn, please. I really think we should keep the lists at perl.org.
After mailing me or (better) [email protected] we'll usually have the
lists setup in no more than 12-24 hours and one of these days I will
upgrade ezmlm-idx and we'll have an archive of everything here.
(Until then there is http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
and [email protected])


 - ask 

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.