Re: What about many many mailing lists?

At 03:42 PM 7/25/00 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > > > I'm still expecting people to object to the idea of many many lists.
> > > > What happened to the people who were saynig yesterday that there
> > > > should only be a few lists?
> > >
> > >No way man, the more lists the better!  }8-)
> >
> > And in that trend...
> >
> > I've set up a *temporary* list for mulling about the guts of perl 6, and
> > it'll last just past the point that the official list gets set up. (It may
> > well last all of three days... :) Send mail to [email protected] with a
> > body of "subscribe perl6guts". It's a place to informally bandy about
> > internals-level stuff (not language design or organization, mind) that
> > isn't bootstrap.
>
>uhmn, please. I really think we should keep the lists at perl.org.

I agree. I thought you were still more or less out of touch, and things 
hadn't really gelled enough for me to be comfortable setting up a list as 
informal as this--the perl.org address gives it an air of legitimacy that 
it really doesn't have. :)

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk