On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:21:55PM -0400, kevin lenzo wrote:
>Adam Turoff wrote:
>> [1] Chip, can we count on you to light the appropriate amount of fires
>> under the SourceForge maintainers should the situation become so
>> dire as to require it?
>
>VA has expressed more-than-cooperation in support of whatever Perl needs,
>but they will need what-we-want as a coherent proposal. Whether it
>exists in SourceForge proper, or we implement it and contribute it back
>with their infrastructure support, depends on what we need and how
>idiosynchratic it becomes. In any event, i think VA has been and is
>unequivocally supportive, and has made positive overtures w/r/t this in
>particular. Maybe this is a way YAS might help, by running a Perl
>what-we-want, perhaps as a node of sourcefrog, with our particular
>needs in mind. I would volunteer that service, if it were desired.
*nodnod* ... I've had similar feedback from VA. I'd be happy to get
together a list of what development tools and infrastructure would be
needed for forwarding to them if necessary.
K.
--
Kirrily Robert -- <[email protected]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Open Source development, consulting and solutions
Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.