Re: Perforce vs CVS
[email protected] (Graham Barr)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:28:35PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 01:03 PM 7/26/00 +1000, [email protected] wrote: > >I'd hate to see us create a barrier to entry which discourages people > >from reading or contributing to the perl source. > > Here's a bigger issue with any source control system we choose. We *must* > make sure that everyone, on any reasonable platform, has access to at least > timely snapshots of the code, and I'd really prefer a full-blown client. Well I use perforce for all my code development I release to CPAN. But my Net::LDAP module has started to gain a large community. To handle this I wrote a script (quick hack) which mirrored the perforce repository into CVS on sourceforge. This gives me, the developer, use of the tool I feel is best for the job and also others get CVS read-only access to any changes as I make them. Graham.