Re: Initial Structure

[email protected] (John Porter)
Newsgroups perl.bootstrap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andy Warhol^WWardley wrote:
> Perhaps also:
> 
>    - Intent        (why make the change?)
>    - Impact        (what else might break?)

That is essentially the "Pro" and "Con" of the change as a whole.



So:

     - Synopsis [brief description]
     - Description [long]
     - Pros ("Why do it?")
     - Cons ("Why not?")
     - Possible implementations:
	1. - Description
	   - Pros
	   - Cons
	...
	n. - Description
	   - Pros
	   - Cons

Since the decision or concensus as to which implementation is the best
-- and indeed, whether the change should be made at all -- must come
from the public discourse, and may change over time, I suggest that
these things be not embedded in the RFC itself, but contained in some
kind of appendix.

-- 
John Porter

	Aus tiefem Traum bin ich erwacht.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.