Re: Initial Structure
[email protected] (Simon Cozens)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 06:37:54PM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote: > I don't think these final two items belong in the RFC; in the best of > all possible worlds, this wouldn't even be discussed at the time an RFC > is created. I feel that an RFC should list issues to be considered in > implementing a solution, such as scalability and security. > > I also think that a justification for the proposed change should be > part of the RFC. Okay. I'm confused. Are RFCs issued by a group leader, or anyone who feels like? Are RFCs the final considered opinion on an issue, or are they the initial thoughts? How, when, and by whom are they updated? -- As the saying goes, if you give a man a fish, he eats for a day. If you teach him to grep for fish, he'll leave you alone all weekend. If you encourage him to beg for fish, pretty soon c.l.p.misc will smell like a three-week-dead trout.-- Tom Phoenix, c.l.p.misc.