Re: RFC: A Test For Every Patch
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn")
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael G Schwern wrote: > In One Sentence > --------------- > > All patches to perl must have an associated testing patch. Discussion forked into "should perl define Perl" and discussion of formats. I would like to comment (on this Request for Comment :) that I agree with Michael strategy. I think patchers should submit a test case along with any patches that are submitted, within reason of course. ;) -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5f8Kr53XjJNtBs4cRAYbxAJwN7MG3cQmz7oTCIv2Vaq0pWeCUOQCcD1/6 MwWgH9AJ61WXG8ajCxjWfsg= =KiVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----