Re: SourceForge, CVS, etc.
[email protected] (Joshua N Pritikin)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:38:58AM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:23:11PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > As much as I like SourceForge, I'd hate to see Perl 6 not developed > > there. But if CVS isn't up to the task, well.... *sigh* > > I'm *really* sorry to keep banging on about this but the artitecture > I have in mind for the Perl Version System (http://perverse.sourceforge.net/) > is to have CVS look after the files and a separate daemon look after the > metadata. Submissions would go in through perverse and we could generate > logs, diffs and change summaries from it the way we do with Perforce, and > people can check out the sources from CVS oblivious to the Perverse goings > on. Ugh. The main reason perforce is cool is because it doesn't feel like a hack. -- Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)