Re: perl 6 requirements
[email protected] ("Grant M.") Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:27:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Organization | Genome Therapeutics Corp |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with this suggestion, and suggest further that discussion lists for each category be implemented, with a link to each list on the corresponding page. This might help resolve the issue listed on the "Development process and community" page, #1, "p5p has been too busy for people to keep up with". The separate discussion lists would allow persons familiar with one aspect of the language to not be overwhelmed by other discussions. (There is a 'Next" link at the top of each page as well, though). Grant M. [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Mills" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 8:14 AM Subject: Re: perl 6 requirements > If an individual had a Perl requirement they wanted to see in the SRD, to > whom would they address/send it? > > Also, on http://infotrope.net/opensource/software/perl6/ it would be useful > to have a table of contents for the HTML link, hyperlinked to each section: > Introduction, Internals, Language, and so on. The NEXT link isn't obvious, > particlarly since users must scroll down to see it. > > Thank-You, > M >