Re: Perlbug questions
[email protected] ((Robert Spier)) Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:47:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.bugmongers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
H.Merijn Brand writes: >On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:42:06 +0200, H.Merijn Brand <[email protected]> wrote: >> Please send latest sql/current_db_structure and change sql/README (tell them/us >> to use current_db_structure when starting fresh; don't refer to non-existing >> files (insert_flags.sql)) and make it clear in the database snapshow *what* >> version I'm dealing with! > >What about changing "-Q" request to [email protected] to return >current_db_structure.sql instead of "show ..." outpur for bugadmins? Maybe make >it a preference option in the admin table. > >OTOH, with my latest -H output (2.23 ha ha), the options -E, -F, -G, -g, -I, -i, >-J, -j, -K, -k, -M, -N, -O, -P, -T, -U, -V, -Y, -Z and -z are still free. We >can claim -N (newest schema) to return the schema in SQL terms. Maybe we also need --long-options? ;) But the real answer is that programs shouldn't be hitting the database directly, if they can find another way. Richard has put a very thourough OO interface into the system, which abstracts away a lot of the database stuff. -R