RE: Perlbug proposal: Old bug, seems to be gone

Absolutely!  Feel free to cc: me with any bugs you discover that are no
longer bugs; I go through hundreds testing them against bleadperl to see if
they still break - and if you're doing the same, your results are very
useful.  Though, if you see this becoming a habit, you can be a bugadmin,
too. :)

R.

ps. um, which bugid did you discover is ready to be closed?  without that
information, it's hard to do much :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 12:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Perlbug proposal: Old bug, seems to be gone
>
>
> I came across this bug while searching for info on a current bug I'm
> investigating. It runs on 5.005_03, 5.6.0, and bleadperl without
> segfaulting.
> Appears to be close-able.
>
> Let me know if this sort of thing is useful; I'll probably come
> across one or
> two more.
>
> -dlc
>
>