Re: Perlbug proposal: Old bug, seems to be gone

Daniel Chetlin wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:52:17AM -0700, Richard Soderberg wrote:
> > Absolutely!  Feel free to cc: me with any bugs you discover that are no
> > longer bugs; I go through hundreds testing them against bleadperl to see if
> > they still break - and if you're doing the same, your results are very
> > useful.  Though, if you see this becoming a habit, you can be a bugadmin,
> > too. :)
> >
> > R.
> >
> > ps. um, which bugid did you discover is ready to be closed?  without that
> > information, it's hard to do much :)
> 
> Hmm. I sent it to [email protected] -- doesn't that
> come through automatedly? I assumed it did.
It should do, I see it has stripped the bugid from the subject line, my fault,
will fix.

Richard (everyone) - have a look at the 'X-Perlbug-Original-To' line (for just
such eventualities :)

> I don't know if bugmongers is the alias for the list of people my propose
Nearly -> [email protected] (also mails [email protected])

> email was initially sent to (that was quoted in your reply), but if it isn't,
> please forward this to all of them so that each of them doesn't individually
> ask which bug it was ;-). I already had one question about that in addition to
> yours.
> 
> Sorry if I misunderstood the email process.
> 
No, it's a bug in the Perlbug automatic process, fixed next time round.

Ciao
Richard Foley
---
[email protected] | [email protected] | [email protected]
'Ciao' - shorter than 'Aufwiedersehen'