cpan_home vs. build_root & locking
[email protected] (Linda W)
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm not sure I understand the reason for the lock file placed in cpan_home. If I have two different architectures with different build directories, I'm not sure I understand where the conflict is -- is it in storing/listing Bundles, the history file, the Metafile or the shared source? I can understand private history, but the Bundles aren't updated often, the sources should be fairly static (unless new files are downloaded), The metafile would be updated about once a day (default). If the build directories are separate, why would there be a need for locking more in interactive use vs. batch use? Thanks for insights... Linda