Re: META-spec

>>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:03:25 +1100, Adam Kennedy <[email protected]> said:

  > (Andreas J. Koenig) wrote:
 >>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:33:18 -0600, Ken Williams <[email protected]> said:
 >> >     19 Mar  4 20:12 META-spec-current.html -> META-spec-v1.2.html
 >> > We could also think about a v1.3, but really nothing of the
 >> *spec*
 >> > has changed since v1.2, just typo-fixing and more examples and some
 >> > reorg.
 >> Maybe repository could be added to resources? The only problem I see
 >> with repository is that one would like to know more than one thing
 >> about it: at least software and access URL, maybe more.
 >> Oh well, one should probably get away with the key
 >> "SubversionRepository".
 >> 

  > Because everybody uses the same version control, right? :)

Nonono, I was indirectly referring to the spec that says that words
containing an uppercase letter are reserved for ad hoc usage, so
'SubversionRepository' is OK, as is 'CvsRepository', 'CVS-Repository',
'CVS', and, of course 'Perforce' and any combination with
'Repository', but not 'svk' alone for example.

Just clarifying what my lazy fingers didn't want to type:)

-- 
andreas