Re: matrix.cpantesters.org: Reports not appearing

On 7/31/22 09:50, James E Keenan wrote:
> As part of my work for Perl 5 Porters in analyzing "Blead Breaks CPAN" 
> (BBC) bug tickets, I frequently have occasion to build perl at the HEAD 
> of the blead (main development) branch, install it and 'cpanm' locally, 
> install Task::CPAN::Reporter against that perl, then try to install CPAN 
> distributions which have been cited in BBC.
> 
> Yesterday, I built and installed perl at this commit:
> 
> #####
> $ ./bin/perl -Ilib -v | head -2 | tail -1
> This is perl 5, version 37, subversion 3 (v5.37.3 
> (v5.37.2-33-gff5bbe677e)) built for amd64-freebsd-thread-multi
> #####
> 
> I then installed Task::CPAN::Reporter (via 'cpanm') and then used 'cpan' 
> to install Test::Trap and Sub::Metadata, generating CPANtesters reports 
> along the way.
> 
> #####
> ...
> cpan[1]> install Sub::Metadata Test::Trap
> ...
> CPAN::Reporter: Test result is 'pass', All tests successful.
> CPAN::Reporter: preparing a CPAN Testers report for Sub-Metadata-0.002
> CPAN::Reporter: sending test report with 'pass' via Metabase
> ...
> CPAN::Reporter: Test result is 'pass', All tests successful.
> CPAN::Reporter: preparing a CPAN Testers report for Test-Trap-v0.3.5
> CPAN::Reporter: sending test report with 'pass' via Metabase
> ...
> $ ./bin/perl -Ilib -MTask::CPAN::Reporter -MTest::Trap -MSub::Metadata 
> -E 'say q|hello world|;'
> hello world
> #####
> 
> These two CPAN distros (and their prerequisites) were duly logged as 
> having had CPANtesters reports generated:
> 
> #####
> $ tail -n 4 ~/.cpanreporter/reports-sent.db
> test PASS Module-Build-0.4231 (perl-5.37.3) amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 
> 12.3-release-p1
> test PASS Sub-Metadata-0.002 (perl-5.37.3) amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 
> 12.3-release-p1
> test PASS Data-Dump-1.25 (perl-5.37.3) amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 
> 12.3-release-p1
> test PASS Test-Trap-v0.3.5 (perl-5.37.3) amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 
> 12.3-release-p1
> #####
> 
> However, when I checked matrix.cpantesters.org today for those reports, 
> I found reports for only 2 of those 4 distros:
> 
> #####
> Distribution|Report URL|Timestamp
> Data-Dump|http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a8c864ee-1050-11ed-84a8-20dc05b3d53a|2022-07-30 
> 21:43
> Test-Trap|http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/ad848512-1050-11ed-a8e1-724c06b3d53a|2022-07-30 
> 21:43
> #####
> 
> #####
> Distribution|No Report URL
> Module-Build|no report from me on Jul 30 2022 at 
> http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Module-Build;os=freebsd;reports=1#sl=4,1 
> 
> Sub-Metadata|no report from me on Jul 30 2022 at 
> http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Sub-Metadata;os=freebsd;reports=1#sl=4,1 
> 
> #####

FWIW, the reports for Module-Build and Sub-Metadata ultimately did start 
to appear.

#####
Distribution|Report URL|Timestamp
Module-Build|http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/9d286e72-1050-11ed-9ff5-80df05b3d53a|2022-07-30 
21:43
Sub-Metadata|http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a2dbbaae-1050-11ed-9fe3-1ac406b3d53a|2022-07-30 
21:43
#####

But I still don't understand why some reports generated in a given batch 
appeared much later than others.