Re: Please, smokers, set AUTOMATED_TESTING=1

[email protected] (James E Keenan)
Newsgroups perl.cpan.testers.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 9/17/24 15:58, Karen Etheridge wrote:
> Please please please, could everyone running automated smokers, set 
> AUTOMATED_TESTING=1 in the environment? As per the Lancaster Consensus, 
> this is a signal to the installer that no human is behind the 
> installation, and most likely a test report will be generated, so it 
> allows the installation to enable different or more verbose diagnostics.
> 
> https://xdg.me/the-annotated-lancaster-consensus/ 
> <https://xdg.me/the-annotated-lancaster-consensus/>
> 
> I have received some perplexing failure reports lately which would be 
> much easier to debug if AUTOMATED_TESTING=1 was set, as I provide a lot 
> of data dumps in the test output when this value is set. As it is I am 
> unable to determine what particular combination of environment in the 
> smoker is resulting in these failures, so I am unable to fix them.
> 
> thank you,
> 
> a CPAN author
> -ether
> 

Could you provide URLs to a couple of such reports that would have been 
more helpful if that envvar had been set?

I ask because I have never consciously set that envvar and I'd like to 
know if the manually-triggered reports I do generate are adequate.

Thanks.
jimk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.