Re: Perl Magpie, a next-generation CPAN Testers reporting platform
[email protected] (James E Keenan)
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.testers.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/28/25 10:03, Ruth Holloway wrote: > I. Rationale > [snip] > V1.0: The basics -- Hope to have this completed and deployed prior to > PTS May 1: > * Accept a properly-formatted test result from cpanm-reporter, using > the Metabase transport pointing at its address. (DONE) In our current setup, when a test result arrives at Metabase, does a report generated by cpanm-reporter look any different from one generated by cpan-reporter or cpanplus-reporter? If not, then shouldn't we be able to send results generated by cpan-reporter *already* be acceptable by Magpie? I ask because, while I used cpanm-reporter within my "CPAN River 3000" project in the late 2010s, I've been using Task::CPAN::Reporter in recent years and would prefer not to have to change. > * Display a matrix for a given distribution, showing all available > test results in an informative aggregate page. (DONE) [snip] Thanks for this well thought-out proposal.