Re: For P::PT -> ExtUtils::XBuilder

On 19.11.12 19:43, Leon Timmermans wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> long time ago I wanted a ExtUtils::CBuilder successor.
>> Leon started such a one, but it hasn't the features I needed for
>> e.g. Proc::ProcessTable or Net::Radio::Location::SUPL::Test - so
>> I started an own one - see http://repo.or.cz/w/ExtUtils-XBuilder.git
>
> I'm still working on that. I actually was planning to post an
> announcement one of these days. I think your goals are a lot more
> high-level than mine, to me it makes more sense to build your library
> on top of mine.

Well, I need control over the invoked executables and flags for
specific languages - especially for integrating it into Config::AutoConf
and do other multi-compile stages (as Net::Radio::Location::SUPL::Test
requires first ASN.1 -> C compile stage, then C -> object, then link
into *.so).

I looked into EU::B and I didn't see that I get full control for
those requirements, but I might be pebcak and not a limitation of
EU::B ;)

>> Now it's time to integrate
>> that solution into P::PT - but I need a better CBuilder for it.
>
> I can imagine that. EU::CB is a 💩

What? Was the word took out by the dis filter ;)
-- 
Jens Rehsack