Re: On the current Test::More-to-be

* David Golden <[email protected]> [2015-05-01 11:25]:
> To the last point, in hindsight, I wish we'd had that discussion first
> at the hackathon as I think it might have influenced the others. Mea
> culpa. Or possibly, we wouldn't have gotten there without the early
> warm discussions as warm-ups.

Those were exactly my own thoughts; as written in my retrospective, in
fact. And no, I don’t think we could have gotten there on direct route.

Basically, while I completely understand your imperative for putting the
T::B discussion up front, it was premature to get technical without
having first established principles under which the technical decisions
ought to be taken… for which I believe it was necessary to go through
the conversations that took place on the days leading up to the river of
CPAN discussion.

> No way to know and we can't do it over

Unfortunately.

> so we'll just have to muddle forward.

Do we just accept that stuff might go flowing downriver?

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>