Re: On Not Merging new and old behavior ( was Re: Test-Stream + MongoDB scalar refcount issue )
[email protected] (Chad Granum)
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.workers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJFr3kv3jCtB5S19vW1pR2BwLCWbzhX54fU4oJy1hVm-i1HUqg@mail.gmail.com> |
I like the Test2 Idea, mind if I upload a module real quick to first-come the namespace? or are you going to claim it? On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]> wrote: > * David Golden <[email protected]> [2015-05-02 19:35]: > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Kent Fredric <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > That is, conceptually, its possible that a misguided author of > > > a distribution at the same level as say, Test::Differences, thinks > > > it wise to simply rewrite their existing code in the new framework. > > > > We've seen that horror show in Dancer/Dancer2 around plugins. > > > > I think that if we ship a Test::More2, then such a release should > > encourage people to leave Test::Foo alone and fork it to Test::Foo2 > > instead. Then a new ecosystem can build up around it without > > sacrificing the existing one. > > It just occurred to me the other day that it might make sense to call > the new thing Test2. So we would get “Test2::Differences” and suchlike. > Then the ecosystems would be distinct from each other on sight. > > -- > Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> >