Re: Documenting best practices and the state of ToolChain guidelines using CPAN and POD
[email protected] (Peter Rabbitson)
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.workers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/06/2015 09:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On 6 May 2015 at 19:26, Peter Rabbitson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Sorry for the sidetrack > > > I was actually hoping for naming feedback :) > > The names suggested seem amenable to me. > > The only real problem I still have to resolve is what name we put > non-article-oriented things like "The Lancaster Consensus" info under. > An "unabridged" version of any of the discussion outcomes isn't really something digestable as a standalone document anyway. So having them as-is on CPAN seems counterproductive to me. Nevertheless if this is desrable - ::Org::Toolchain::Minutes::(Lancaster|Berlin|Whathaveyou...)