Re: Berlin Consensus document posted to toolchain-site
[email protected] (John SJ Anderson)
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.workers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABJ3DF9BieFYKL=HPJQJ6px53tY0SWpcp3shbgA300OgbsC0LA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM, David Golden <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://github.com/Perl-Toolchain-Gang/toolchain-site/blob/master/berlin-consensus.md > > I've posted the Berlin Consensus document. > Perhaps this will come in the "color commentary" version, but I wonder if there was any discussion of how to best handle the situation where a module starts "way downstream" but ends up "way upstream" because of popular adoption, *if the module author doesn't agree to the "way upstream" recommended policies*. chrs, john.