Release::Checklist
[email protected] ("H.Merijn Brand")
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.workers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* [Tux] thinks about creating a short ticklist for "What do I do before a release" <[Tux]> xdg, if we take all the "What should we do" in the three river sections <[Tux]> and create an "action" for each of those with suggested modules to support that "best-practice" <[Tux]> module authors can use it to check every point, still haveing the freedom to ignore any of the points <[Tux]> [v] make test <[Tux]> [v] check spelling <[Tux]> [ ] check Changlog <[Tux]> [ ] check upstream <[Tux]> [ ] check downstream <[Tux]> etc etc <[Tux]> Module::Release, Test::*, Pod::Spell::CommonMistakes, Text::Aspell, ... <BooK> Tux: so the policies can be partly expressed in code... * [Tux] is preparing a new Text::CSV_XS release <[Tux]> and the test process by now takes so long I tend to forget steps <[Tux]> first test with 105 versions of perl <[Tux]> then test on all available OS's <[Tux]> then performance tests <[Tux]> etc etc <[Tux]> then downriver tests <[Tux]> a T::CXS release takes a complete working day https://github.com/Tux/Release-Checklist started as a first brainfart any takers for co-maint? -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using perl5.00307 .. 5.21 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 490 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVYZwiAAoJEAOhR6E+XcCYuR8H/j6fPM7hVvFxEyZFTg6j5+KX BmMorUxy2UqM9lXZtBdspe9PWkHb74TzfQR3X6vN5OjuoTzDmYVSeIrDrDaApmm8 M++6xtjlcOxN5Jw/2CCOZYNLV/P7oQCkn77aCFC1AO7SiwM7t7mWW/TxDbYdmB7E jvWnOcYNcNoFCt2ivLcs4q0GI81x/+IwmNbTd6Wohc864tKvaQf90IJKAsymgimh m3PYsA0F9++X+xP3e2EEo0JalMvfo5X0KXJ8cHyHREFRNSt5db/k0NDWcZYzzlX3 czjyovST1Nm+b4oxgooONtiERddX37O3h2Uxez85iA4pA8UP530fBNb7mZ2+TXc= =hpA6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----