Re: Perl 6 versus the CPAN
[email protected] (David Golden)
| Newsgroups | perl.cpan.workers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The last discussion I recall getting into, I strongly recommended that we create a separate directory for P6 modules. (I.e., not "authors/id/X/XY/XYZ"). This would make it easier for mirrors (and other tools) to filter on pathname without having to look at META files to determine what language something is. Better indexing can help, but only to a point. -- David On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Ruslan Zakirov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Ovid. > > Jesse was trying to convince people to re-use the current CPAN > architecture to host p6 modules. Cced him. May be he has some summary. > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ovid > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I know there was a fair chunk of discussion regarding Perl 6 on the CPAN, but have we gotten anywhere? More and more Perl 6 code is being written and sooner or later, people would like someplace to put it other than github or code.google.com :)