Re: Why are versions restricted to 999?

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> wrote:
> If this is all about supporting out of date Perls and toolchains, can we
> downgrade it to a recommendation/should rather than a must?  It seems silly to
> declare a meta file invalid just to support some dying edge cases.

I'm willing to call it a "should" and do a "typo fix" in the spec.
(As long as you promise to actually *read* things when I ask for
review *before* I release them.)

Any opposed?

-- David