| Newsgroups |
perl.cvs.perlfaq |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
cvsuser 02/01/30 17:46:23
Modified: . perlfaq1.pod
Log:
* updated 'How can I convince my sysadmin/supervisor/employees' for the
current perl version number and date
Revision Changes Path
1.6 +3 -3 perlfaq/perlfaq1.pod
Index: perlfaq1.pod
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/public/perlfaq/perlfaq1.pod,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -w -r1.5 -r1.6
--- perlfaq1.pod 27 Jan 2002 20:22:52 -0000 1.5
+++ perlfaq1.pod 31 Jan 2002 01:46:23 -0000 1.6
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
=head1 NAME
-perlfaq1 - General Questions About Perl ($Revision: 1.5 $, $Date: 2002/01/27 20:22:52 $)
+perlfaq1 - General Questions About Perl ($Revision: 1.6 $, $Date: 2002/01/31 01:46:23 $)
=head1 DESCRIPTION
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
Over a hundred quips by Larry, from postings of his or source code,
can be found at http://www.cpan.org/misc/lwall-quotes.txt.gz .
-=head2 How can I convince my sysadmin/supervisor/employees to use version 5/5.005/Perl instead of some other language?
+=head2 How can I convince my sysadmin/supervisor/employees to use version 5/5.6.1/Perl instead of some other language?
If your manager or employees are wary of unsupported software, or
software which doesn't officially ship with your operating system, you
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
(Well, OK, maybe it's not quite that distinct, but you get the idea.)
If you want support and a reasonable guarantee that what you're
developing will continue to work in the future, then you have to run
-the supported version. As of April 2001 that probably means
+the supported version. As of January 2002 that probably means
running either of the releases 5.6.1 (released in April 2001) or
5.005_03 (released in March 1999), although 5.004_05 isn't that bad
if you B<absolutely> need such an old version (released in April 1999)