Smoke [maint-5.42] v5.42.3-3-ga35b46c47a PASS linux 5.4.0-216-generic [Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (x86_64/1 cpu)

[email protected] ("Carlos Guevara")
Newsgroups perl.daily-build.reports
Message-ID <20260814093034.BB1271603BA@cjg-focal>
Automated smoke report for branch maint-5.42 5.42.3 patch a35b46c47a0374d60fcc3c0e5d4c122a0bfc6c6f v5.42.3-3-ga35b46c47a
cjg-focal: Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-2145 CPU @ 3.70GHz (GenuineIntel 3696MHz) (x86_64/1 cpu)
    on        linux - 5.4.0-216-generic [Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (focal)]
    using     clang++ version Clang 10.0.0
    smoketime 1 hour 49 minutes (average 18 minutes 11 seconds)

Summary: PASS

O = OK  F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
X = Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness
? = still running or test results not (yet) available
Build failures during:       - = unknown or N/A
c = Configure, m = make, M = make (after miniperl), t = make test-prep

v5.42.3-3-ga35b46c47a  Configuration (common) -Accflags='-DPERL_RC_STACK -DDEBUG_LEAKING_SCALARS' -Dcc=clang++
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
O O         
O O         -Duse64bitall
O O         -Duselongdouble
| +--------- -DDEBUGGING
+----------- no debugging


Testsuite was run only with 'harness'

Tests skipped on user request:
    # One test name on a line
MANIFEST did not declare '.mailmap'

Passed Todo tests: (common-args) -Accflags='-DPERL_RC_STACK -DDEBUG_LEAKING_SCALARS' -Dcc=clang++
[default] 
[default] -Duse64bitall
[default] -Duselongdouble
../t/run/todo.t.............................................PASSED
    3-4
../cpan/Time-Piece/t/06large.t..............................PASSED
    1-250

[default] -DDEBUGGING
[default] -DDEBUGGING -Duse64bitall
[default] -DDEBUGGING -Duselongdouble
../cpan/Time-Piece/t/06large.t..............................PASSED
    1-250

Compiler messages(gcc):
regcomp_study.c:106:13: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
./regcharclass.h:992:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_latin1_safe'
regcomp_study.c:192:13: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
./regcharclass.h:495:49: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
./regcharclass.h:322:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part0_'
./regcharclass.h:495:92: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
./regcharclass.h:354:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
./regcharclass.h:377:6: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
./regcharclass.h:378:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
./regcharclass.h:384:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
./regcharclass.h:501:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
./regcharclass.h:554:19: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
./regcharclass.h:407:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part2_'
./regcharclass.h:554:62: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
./regcharclass.h:465:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part3_'
regexec.c:3119:35: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
./regcharclass.h:58:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_LNBREAK_utf8_safe'
./regcharclass.h:65:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_LNBREAK_utf8_safe'
regexec.c:3124:39: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
./regcharclass.h:76:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_LNBREAK_latin1_safe'
Socket.xs:784:35: warning: missing field 'ai_family' initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
re_comp_study.c:106:13: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
../../regcharclass.h:992:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_latin1_safe'
re_comp_study.c:192:13: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
../../regcharclass.h:495:49: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
../../regcharclass.h:322:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part0_'
../../regcharclass.h:495:92: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
../../regcharclass.h:354:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
../../regcharclass.h:377:6: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
../../regcharclass.h:378:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
../../regcharclass.h:384:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_'
../../regcharclass.h:501:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
../../regcharclass.h:554:19: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
../../regcharclass.h:407:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part2_'
../../regcharclass.h:554:62: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe'
../../regcharclass.h:465:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part3_'
re_exec.c:3119:35: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
../../regcharclass.h:58:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_LNBREAK_utf8_safe'
../../regcharclass.h:65:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_LNBREAK_utf8_safe'
re_exec.c:3124:39: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare]
../../regcharclass.h:76:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_LNBREAK_latin1_safe'

Non-Fatal messages(gcc):



-- 
Report by Test::Smoke v1.71 running on perl 5.38.0
(Reporter v0.053 / Smoker v0.046)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.