Re: patch

[email protected] (H . Merijn Brand)
Newsgroups perl.daily-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri 24 Aug 2001 17:04, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> For the record, I ran all the tests last night after adding some ./ and

awaiting those ...

> removing some bashisms, but then the report failed.  I suppose a few

bashisms? Do you think we should change

    export BAR=foo

to

    BAR=foo
    export BAR

for portability? It's POSIX I think, not bash. I'm a tcsh user (sometimes sh),
but seldom if never bash, so I realy don't know about bash features creaping
in.

> "or die"s wouldn't go amiss.  I'll send my patches when it's all runing
> on tru64.

-- 
H.Merijn Brand    Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.1 & 628 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
  WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11.  Smoking perl CORE: [email protected]
http://archives.develooper.com/[email protected]/   [email protected]
send smoke reports to: [email protected], QA: http://qa.perl.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.