Re: [ID 20010219.012] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL8840 oni386-freebsd4.0-release

[email protected] (Richard Soderberg)
Newsgroups perl.daily-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
How could you tell the difference between a failure from bad option and a
Configure error - "syntax error in line 6734"?

R.

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, H.Merijn Brand wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:40:28 +0100, Richard Foley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Richard Soderberg wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Richard Foley wrote:
> > > 
> > > > a mail to [email protected] with the following (nearly inherent)
> > > > hints:
> > > 
> > > >       category=dailybuild
> > > >       status=open|closed
> > > >       severity=fatal|high
> > > 
> > > ack=yes|no
> > > 
> > > Builds that have no test failures could be ok reports, too.
> > > Builds that don't successfully compile get a severity=fatal.
> > > 
> > > Very nice.
> > 
> > Is 'dailybuild' appropriate, or should that read something else?
> > 
> > I guess it would be sensible if it was something along the lines of the 
> > mailing list address name (smokers|testpilots|...) for consistency. 
> 
> Should we report "Configure failures" as
> 
>   [ ] Not at all
>   [ ] Success
>   [ ] Failure
>   [ ] Other
> 
> Here I mean that Configure is unable to proceed with the given configuration,
> e.g. 'Configure -Dusethreads' on a system that does /not/ support threads or
> 'Configure -Duse64bitall' on an OS that does not support 64 bit operations.
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.