Re: [ID 20010219.012] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL8840 oni386-freebsd4.0-release
[email protected] (Richard Soderberg)
| Newsgroups | perl.daily-build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
How could you tell the difference between a failure from bad option and a Configure error - "syntax error in line 6734"? R. On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:40:28 +0100, Richard Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Richard Soderberg wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Richard Foley wrote: > > > > > > > a mail to [email protected] with the following (nearly inherent) > > > > hints: > > > > > > > category=dailybuild > > > > status=open|closed > > > > severity=fatal|high > > > > > > ack=yes|no > > > > > > Builds that have no test failures could be ok reports, too. > > > Builds that don't successfully compile get a severity=fatal. > > > > > > Very nice. > > > > Is 'dailybuild' appropriate, or should that read something else? > > > > I guess it would be sensible if it was something along the lines of the > > mailing list address name (smokers|testpilots|...) for consistency. > > Should we report "Configure failures" as > > [ ] Not at all > [ ] Success > [ ] Failure > [ ] Other > > Here I mean that Configure is unable to proceed with the given configuration, > e.g. 'Configure -Dusethreads' on a system that does /not/ support threads or > 'Configure -Duse64bitall' on an OS that does not support 64 bit operations. > >