Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 18603 FAIL(m) linux 2.4.20 (i686/2 cpus)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:29:04PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Thu 30 Jan 2003 13:24, Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:18:41PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:

> > > p5p: where are our bounds if we are to support this in general?
> > 
> > 1: I don't think we can
> 
> 	-e '/^#.*<[a-z][-a-z ]*>/d'

there's going to be Unicode in one of them soon, so I think that you're
going to need \w in there.
Oh $expletive. But that's sed, isn't it, not perl?

> > 2: I think that gcc generating programmatic output (not human output) that
> >    varies depending on locale is a bug in gcc, and should be reported as
> >    such.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> > (I admit that I've not thought fully about either answer)
> 
> Do you ever? <duck>

Well, sometimes I spend more than 60 seconds.

I did think enough to delete my original thought from the message
(which I now realise I should just have rot13ed:

Naq vs gurl qba'g nterr gung vg'f n oht, jr whfg xrrc fraqvat gurz arj
genafyngvbaf bs 'shpxvat fghcvq' hagvy gurl trg gur zrffntr shpxvat fghcvq
)

Nicholas Clark